
Metacomposition 1: Camilla
2010
Metacomposition 2
in progress
Metacompositions
Metacomposition 2 Compositions
Composition 1: Piano Concerto 2
piano and orchestra | 2010 | 20 ′
Composition 2
Pierrot ensemble | 2011 | 15 ′
Composition 3
computer | 2016 | 70 ′
Metacomposition 1 Compositions
Composition 1
computer and orchestra | in progress
Pre-algorithmic Compositions
Piano Concerto 1
piano and orchestra | 2006 – 2009 | 20 ′
Dances
piano | 2004 – 2010 | 10 ′
Contours
piano | 2001 – 2010 | 13 ′


Metacomposition 1, Composition 3 (1-3 for short) was composed in March 2016 using a com-
puter program that I wrote in the summer of 2010. 1-3 is the third composition I have made us-
ing this program titled Metacomposition 1: Camilla. The program works out the low-level logist-
ics of composing in a set theory paradigm and leaves the high-level design to me.
Listening to 1-3 is like taking a long car trip that passes through six distinctive cities each sep-
arated by empty countryside. The form comprises six main sections. Each section favors a dif-
ferent interval class both melodically and harmonically. Each is separated from its neighboring
section by a long interlude where all the interval classes are equally weighted.
Like the scenery in a long car trip, the timbre and register combinations in 1-3 constantly but
gradually change. All seven combinations of its three timbres (pure, moderate, and rich) occur
in all fifteen combinations of its four registers (SATB), presenting in total 105 (7 × 15) combina-
tions. These combinations, shown below, were ordered by the program to maximize continuity.
The combinatorial timbre scheme accompanies a soloist-like voice throughout. This 'soloist'
voice contrasts with the other voices. All the others have confined ranges and extremely static
timbres with mechanical sounding on/off envelopes and unwavering pitch. In contrast, the
'soloist' presents a tapering envelope and gliding pitch in a free, encompassing range.
Formal outline of Metacomposition 1, Composition 3